
SRC - the center for a cost effective and
excellent solution for your chronic pain of the neck, Cervical spondylosis, shoulder,
elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee, ankle, foot, back, thigh, tibia, Osteo arthritis, diabetic sores,
asthma, stroke, sports injuries, chronic skin diseases by means of Sonotron Therapy - the
21st century alternative to modern medicine
Home |
Benefits |
Testimonials
for chronic pain of the neck, Cervical spondylosis,
shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee, ankle, foot, back, thigh, tibia,
Osteo arthritis,
diabetic sores, asthma, stroke, skin diseases, sports injuries |
e-mail SRC
for more information on
chronic pain of the neck, Cervical spondylosis, shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee,
ankle, foot, back, thigh, tibia, Osteo arthritis, diabetic sores, asthma, stroke, skin diseases,
sports injuries
|
Sonotron Therapy is one of your best choices as it is noted by most
as the 21st century alternative to modern medicine for chronic pain of the neck, Cervical
spondylosis, shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee, ankle, foot, back, thigh,
tibia, Osteoarthritis, diabetic sores, asthma, stroke, skin diseases, sports injuries. It is a
drug free method, rapid in action, non invasive in its method of application; a non
surgical method of treatment and one of the latest, if not the latest alternative medical
therapy available today. |

Sonotron Therapy On
Chronic Knee Pain
(Case 1) |
|

KNEE PROBLEM OF 10 YEARS

History:
The patient, a 40 year old man, had pain in his left knee for about 10 years. A doctor
diagnosed his problem to be caused by thinning of the capsule in his knee joint.
Since 7 years back, he could not bend his knee completely. Besides, he also felt
pain in this problem area, on and off, for the past 10 years. He was treated with Short
Wave diathermy at the hospital for 3 sessions prior to the start of Sonotron Therapy
and was on pain killing drugs.
RESULT AFTER 1ST THERAPY SESSION ON MAY 17, 1995.
Prior to the Sonotron therapy, the patient had taken his regular dose of his pain killing
drug and was given a session of Short Wave diathermy. Despite the situation, he registered
a pain score of 8 out of 10 when he bent his knee with the support of both hands. He was
able to bend to a maximum of 90 degrees.
Immediately after the Sonotron treatment, he was able to bend his L-knee completely with
only one hand to support his movement with an improvement of his pain score to 6 out of 10.
RESULT AFTER 2ND THERAPY SESSION ON MAY 18, 1995.
Just prior to treatment, he felt less pain than the day before, when he bent his L-knee.
He reported a pain score of only 4 out of 10 at his L-knee. He also observed that he
was able to bend more. The angle of maximum bending, with the support of only one hand,
was measured to be 50 degrees, 10 degrees above the angle of complete flexion of his knee.
Immediately after treatment, he registered a score of 2 out of 10, an improvement in his
pain on bending. He was also able to bend his knee completely without any support of
either hand.
RESULT AFTER 3RD THERAPY SESSION ON MAY 19, 1995.
Prior to Sonotron Therapy, he reported a pain score of 4 out of 10 in his L-knee. He
also observed that he was able to bend completely without support.
After therapy, he reported a pain score of only 2 out of 10 in his L-knee when he bent it.
He commented that Sonotron was able to reduce his pain very quickly and effectively and he
was very happy with the treatment.
RESULT AFTER 4TH THERAPY SESSION ON MAY 20, 1995.
In the evening of the day before, he exerted himself by taking part in sporting
activities. He reported that his pain had increased to a level of 5 out of 10 in his
L-knee. He also observed that he was still able to bend completely without support. He was
advised to take care and not to overstrain himself again, if possible.
After therapy, he reported a pain score of 1 out of 10 in his L-knee when he bent it. He
commented that the pain had reduced drastically.
"Before 17/5/95 I had short wave for 2 sessions, the effect was slow. After the
treatment from Sonotron, I feel the effect is faster and better. The pain reduced
tremendously and I can bend better without any support. The effect from medication is
slow."
 |
 |
GENERAL COMMENT
1. Pain score was measured by patient, using his best judgment.
2. Pain Score 0 - No pain
Pain Score 10 - Excruciating pain
3. Operator of device was always the same person.
4. Interactive communication was always encouraged between patient and operator of
device in order to gauge the degree of improvement in patient's problem as treatment
progressed. Treatment ended when patient felt comfortable enough or when
pain disappeared.
|
|
This site has been
optimized for Netscape 3.x and Internet Explorer 4.x
This page was last
updated on 08/22/08
|
|