
SRC - the center for a cost effective and
excellent solution for your chronic pain of the neck, Cervical spondylosis, shoulder,
elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee, ankle, foot, back, thigh, tibia, arthritis, diabetic sores,
asthma, stroke, sports injuries, chronic skin diseases by means of Sonotron Therapy - the
21st century alternative to modern medicine
Home |
Benefits |
Testimonials
for chronic pain of the neck, Cervical spondylosis,
shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee, ankle, foot, back, thigh, tibia, arthritis,
diabetic sores, asthma, stroke, skin diseases, sports injuries |
e-mail SRC
for more information on
chronic pain of the neck, Cervical spondylosis, shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee,
ankle, foot, back, thigh, tibia, arthritis, diabetic sores, asthma, stroke, skin diseases,
sports injuries
|
Sonotron Therapy is one of your best choices as it is noted by most
as the 21st century alternative to modern medicine for chronic pain of the neck, Cervical
spondylosis, shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee, ankle, foot, back, thigh,
tibia, arthritis, diabetic sores, asthma, stroke, skin diseases, sports injuries. It is a
drug free method, rapid in action, non invasive in its method of application; a non
surgical method of treatment and one of the latest, if not the latest alternative medical
therapy available today. |

Sonotron Therapy On
Chronic Knee Pain
(Case 2) |
|

PHYSIOTHERAPIST WITH CHRONIC KNEE PAIN

The
patient, a 51 year old Physiotherapist, had pain in her left knee for 1 year. Had
undergone physiotherapy treatment with Short Wave, Ultra-sound and Interferential, on
and off, for 5 months. Was also on medication (Tilcotil - one tablet daily). She
observed no improvement in her condition. She decided to stop the medication 3 months
prior to the start of Sonotron Therapy.
GENERAL SYMPTOMS EXPERIENCED BY PATIENT:
Prior to the start of Sonotron therapy, patient complained of pain in her left knee
whenever she bent her leg or squatted. She also felt the pain when sitting cross-legged.
She could not pray in that position at all. She reported a pain score of 7 out of 10 when
bending her legs. Her pain score rose to 9 out of 10 when she forced herself to sit
cross-legged. She also observed that her left knee was slightly swollen on one side.
RESULT AFTER 1ST THERAPY SESSION ON MAY 16, 1995.
Before the Sonotron treatment, she was asked to locate by herself, the most painful spot
in her knee. She located it by bending her left knee, at which time, she reported a pain
score of 7 out of 10 and a pain score of 9 out of 10 when she tried to sit with her legs
crossed.
Immediately after the treatment, she felt no more pain. She reported a pain score of 0 out
of 10 on bending. When she sat with legs crossed, she only experienced a pain score of 3
out of 10.
RESULT AFTER 2ND THERAPY SESSION ON MAY 17, 1995.
In the morning of the 2nd therapy session, she only felt a bit of pain when sitting cross
legged on the floor while praying. She reported her pain score to be around 2 out of 10 at
her L-knee. But she didn't feel any pain on bending. It had disappeared. She also observed
that the slight swelling on one side of her knee had also disappeared. When she sat cross
legged, she experienced a pain score of only 2 out of 10.
Immediately after treatment, she registered an improvement in her pain, at a score of 1
out of 10, when she sat cross legged .
RESULT AFTER 3RD THERAPY SESSION ON MAY 18, 1995.
In the morning of the 3rd therapy session, when she had to sit cross legged during prayer
time, she reported a pain score of around 1 out of 10 at her L-knee and her pain on
bending did not return even on that day.
After therapy, she reported no pain at all when
sitting cross legged on the floor. She commented that she felt much better and her comment
about the treatment was "excellent".
RESULT ON MAY 19, 1995.
She reported that she had totally no pain when sitting cross legged on the floor as well
as when bending her knees.
Although she was advised to continue with one or two more sessions to get a better overall
treatment, she felt it was no longer necessary. Therefore, no treatment was administered
to her on that day.
RESULT ON MAY 20, 1995.
The patient felt the same pain-free condition on this day. No treatment was given to her
as she felt it was again not necessary.
 |
GENERAL COMMENT
1. Pain score was measured by patient, using his best judgment.
2. Pain Score 0 - No pain
Pain Score 10 - Excruciating pain
3. Operator of device was always the same person.
4. Interactive communication was always encouraged between patient and operator of
device in order to gauge the degree of improvement in patient's problem as treatment
progressed. Treatment ended when patient felt comfortable enough or when
pain disappeared.
|
|

This site has been
optimized for Netscape 3.x and Internet Explorer 4.x
This page was last
updated on 08/22/08
|
|